The First Industrial Revolution (1760-1840): The Birth of the Modern Industrial World
The First Industrial Revolution was the transformation of the British economy, and to a lesser extent the economies of a few other countries, from a largely agricultural and handicraft system into a mechanized, factory-based, and steam-powered industrial system, between roughly 1760 and 1840. It is one of the most important turning points in human history, comparable in significance to the Agricultural Revolution of the Neolithic period. The First Industrial Revolution created the modern factory, the modern industrial city, the railway, and the steam-powered economy, and it laid the foundations for the world in which we still live.
This pillar page provides a comprehensive account of the First Industrial Revolution. It covers the key industries and inventions, the geography of industrialization, the social and political consequences, and the relationship between the First Industrial Revolution and the broader history of industrialization. More detailed coverage of particular topics is available in the linked cluster pages and their associated long-tail articles.
What the First Industrial Revolution Was
The First Industrial Revolution is conventionally dated from about 1760, when the spinning of cotton began to be mechanized, to about 1840, by which time the railway had become the dominant form of long-distance transport and Britain had become the world’s first industrial nation. The period saw a series of closely related changes in technology, organization, and economic geography.
The most visible changes were in the technology of production. New machines, most importantly the spinning jenny, water frame, and spinning mule for spinning, and the power loom for weaving, mechanized the production of cloth. The steam engine, improved by James Watt in the 1760s and 1770s, became the universal source of industrial power. The production of iron was transformed by the use of coke instead of charcoal for smelting and by the development of the puddling process. New forms of transport, including the canal and the railway, made it possible to move raw materials and finished goods in much larger quantities than before.
These technological changes were accompanied by equally important changes in the organization of production. The factory system, in which workers were brought together in large buildings to operate machines driven by a central source of power, became the dominant form of industrial organization. The factory system replaced the older domestic system, in which workers produced goods in their own homes, and it produced new forms of work discipline, new kinds of supervision, and new patterns of working-class life.
The First Industrial Revolution was also a regional phenomenon. It was concentrated in Britain, and within Britain in particular regions, including the cotton-spinning district of Lancashire, the woolen district of the West Riding of Yorkshire, the iron and coal districts of the West Midlands, South Wales, and the Scottish Lowlands, and the engineering center of Birmingham. Other countries, including France, Belgium, and the United States, began to industrialize during this period, but Britain was the world leader, producing a large share of the world’s manufactured goods by 1840.
The Key Industries
The First Industrial Revolution was driven by a small number of industries, each of which experienced a dramatic transformation.
Cotton and Textiles
The industry that changed first and most dramatically was the cotton industry. The combination of the new spinning machines, the power loom, and the steam engine allowed cotton to be produced in quantities and at prices that would have been unimaginable in the early eighteenth century. The story of the textile industry in the First Industrial Revolution is in many ways the story of the Industrial Revolution as a whole.
The success of the British cotton industry depended on a steady supply of raw cotton, which came increasingly from the American South after the invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1793. By 1840, the United States was supplying the majority of the raw cotton used in British mills, and the British cotton industry was the largest single industry in the world. The article on the cotton gin describes how the American South became the world’s leading cotton producer.
Other textile industries, including wool, linen, and silk, were also transformed by the new machines, but more slowly. The woolen industry of the West Riding of Yorkshire, for example, was mechanized only in the early nineteenth century, and the linen industry of Scotland and Ireland not until the 1820s and 1830s.
Steam Power
The single most important new technology of the First Industrial Revolution was the steam engine. From the early Newcomen engines used to pump water out of coal mines to the improved Watt engines of the late eighteenth century, and then to the high-pressure engines that powered the first steam locomotives and steamships, the steam engine was the universal power source of the new industrial age. The article on steam power and the steam engine provides a detailed account of this central technology.
Iron and Steel
The First Industrial Revolution required iron in unprecedented quantities, for machines, bridges, ships, and rails. The substitution of coke for charcoal in smelting, pioneered by Abraham Darby at Coalbrookdale, and the development of the puddling process in the 1780s made iron cheaper and more abundant. By the 1830s, British iron production was more than ten times what it had been in the 1760s, and iron had become one of the most important industries in the country. The iron and steel story describes how the new iron industry was built.
Transportation
The First Industrial Revolution also transformed the transportation of goods and people. The canal-building mania of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries provided a network of inland waterways that could carry bulky goods cheaply, and the railway boom of the 1830s and 1840s created an entirely new form of transport. The steamship, made practical by the development of more efficient marine engines, gradually replaced the sailing ship on the major trade routes. The article on the transportation revolution describes how the new transport systems changed the geography of the industrial economy.
The Factory System and Urbanization
Perhaps the most important social consequence of the First Industrial Revolution was the rise of the factory system and the rapid growth of industrial cities. The factory system concentrated workers, machines, and power in a single building, and it required the existence of a large, disciplined labor force willing to work long hours for low wages. The conditions in the early factories were often brutal, with long hours, dangerous machinery, and frequent accidents. Children, sometimes as young as five or six, worked alongside adults in many industries, and the campaign for factory reform was one of the defining political movements of the early nineteenth century.
The growth of the factory system was closely tied to the growth of industrial cities. As factories were built, they drew workers from the surrounding countryside, and the new industrial cities grew at an unprecedented rate. Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, and Glasgow all grew from small market towns into major industrial cities in the space of a few decades. The article on the factory system and urbanization describes how the new industrial cities emerged and what life was like in them.
The Geography of the First Industrial Revolution
The First Industrial Revolution was concentrated in particular regions of Britain, and the reasons why it flourished in some places and not others are closely tied to the geography of resources, transport, and labor.
The most important industrial region was Lancashire, where the combination of a moist climate suitable for cotton spinning, abundant water power from the Pennine streams, easy access to the port of Liverpool for imported raw cotton, and an existing population of skilled textile workers made it the natural home of the cotton industry. The article on the Lancashire cotton industry provides more detail on this.
Other important industrial regions included the West Riding of Yorkshire, dominated by the woolen industry; the West Midlands, with Birmingham at its center, dominated by a wide range of metal-working industries; South Wales, dominated by coal and iron; the Scottish Lowlands, with coal, iron, and shipbuilding; and the Northeast, with coal mining and the early development of the railway. The article on the causes of the Industrial Revolution describes how the geography of coal and iron ore shaped the geography of industry.
Britain in the World Economy
By 1840, the First Industrial Revolution had made Britain the dominant economic power in the world. British manufactured goods, especially cotton textiles, were exported to every continent. British capital was invested in mines, plantations, and railways across the globe. The British navy, the most powerful in the world, protected the trade routes that carried British goods to every market. The British Empire, which had been growing steadily since the seventeenth century, became the largest in history, in part because of the economic power that the Industrial Revolution gave Britain.
The relationship between the Industrial Revolution and the British Empire was a two-way street. The Empire provided raw materials, especially cotton, and markets for British manufactured goods. It also provided capital, in the form of profits from the colonial trade, and it provided opportunities for the investment of British capital in railways, mines, and plantations abroad. The article on colonialism and British industrialization describes this relationship in detail.
The British dominance of the world economy had important consequences for the rest of the world. The flood of cheap British manufactured goods undercut traditional handicraft industries in India, China, and elsewhere, with devastating effects on local economies. The demand for raw materials led to the intensification of slavery, the growth of plantation agriculture, and the eventual colonization of much of Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific. The article on the global reach of industrialization provides more detail on these effects.
The Limits of the First Industrial Revolution
The First Industrial Revolution was a transformation of industry, transport, and some aspects of daily life, but it was not a complete modernization of British society. Most of the population still lived in the countryside, and most economic activity, even in 1840, was still agricultural. Many aspects of life, from family structure to religious practice to the rhythms of the agricultural year, were little changed by industrialization.
The First Industrial Revolution also left many problems unresolved. Working conditions in factories and mines remained dangerous, even after the Factory Acts of the 1830s and 1840s. The new industrial cities remained crowded, polluted, and unhealthy, with regular outbreaks of cholera, typhus, and other diseases. The gap between rich and poor was as wide as it had ever been, and the politics of industrial Britain were dominated by the struggles between employers and workers.
These unresolved problems would shape the Second Industrial Revolution, the great wave of industrialization that began in the 1870s and transformed Britain, Germany, the United States, France, Japan, and many other countries.
The Long-Term Significance
The First Industrial Revolution was the beginning of modern industrial society. Almost every aspect of contemporary life, from the clothes we wear to the way we work, the cities we live in, and the energy we use, can be traced back to changes that began in the British Midlands and Lancashire in the late eighteenth century. The technologies it introduced, the economic systems it brought into being, and the social problems it generated continue to shape debates over growth, inequality, technology, and the environment.
Understanding the First Industrial Revolution is therefore essential for understanding the origins of the modern world, beyond an exercise in historical curiosity.
The most important open scholarly debate about the First Industrial Revolution is the standard-of-living debate: did the average British worker of 1810-1840 live better, worse, or roughly the same as the average British worker of 1760-1790? The traditional pessimistic answer, going back to J. L. and Barbara Hammond’s The Town Labourer (1917) and given its modern form in E. P. Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class (1963), is that the early industrial worker was substantially worse off: real wages fell, working conditions deteriorated, and the destruction of the domestic system and the handloom trade created a generation of dispossessed workers. The optimistic answer, developed in T. S. Ashton’s The Industrial Revolution, 1760-1830 (1948) and given its quantitative form in Peter Lindert and Jeffrey Williamson’s American Inequality (1976) and Robert Allen’s The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective (2009), is that real wages of unskilled British workers were roughly stable 1790-1820, then rose sharply 1820-1850, and that the early pessimistic estimates confused regional Lancashire with Britain as a whole. Jane Humphries’ Childhood and Child Labour in Industrial England (2010) added a third twist by showing, from pauper-letter and household-budget evidence, that child wages were an essential part of family survival, so that the Factory Acts of the 1830s had the unintended effect of cutting the household income of the poorest families by 10-20 percent. The interesting current question, raised in the work of economic historian Jane Humphries and developed in the recent literature on welfare comparisons across the pre-industrial/industrial divide, is whether the welfare gains from industrialization (higher real wages, lower child mortality, longer life expectancy) can be compared on the same scale as the welfare losses (de-skilling, the destruction of the cottage economy, environmental degradation), and the answer is probably: the gains and losses are not comparable on a single scale, and the historical evidence supports a “mixed effects” reading rather than a single-sided pessimism or optimism.
See also
- Steam power and the steam engine
- Textile industry innovations
- Transportation revolution
- Iron and steel production